Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Essential Beatles

:{{la|The Essential Beatles}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Essential_Beatles Stats])

:({{Find sources|The Essential Beatles}})

Non-notable Beatles compilation. There are dozens of one-off compilations released in foreign markets and nothing shows that this one is particularly special or has critical commentary. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Essential_Beatles&curid=37162588&diff=519675954&oldid=518746552 PROD was denied]. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:58, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:47, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

---

• Merge / redirect to The Beatles discography#Compilation albums. To say the band are notable is a bit more than just an understatement, and even obscure compilations can be notable, but only if they appear in multiple, independent, reliable sources - which this one doesn't. If it's non-notable Beatles albums you're after, try [http://www.bootlegzone.com/album.php?name=ve-dx62§ion=1 The Beatles vs the Third Reich] instead. --Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.