Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Field (pub)

=[[The Field (pub)]]=

:{{la|The Field (pub)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Field_(pub) Stats])

:({{Find sources|The Field (pub)}})

No indication that this San Diego pub is notable. Unreferenced since 2006. Google News Archive search found only routine mentions. MelanieN (talk) 03:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 03:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 03:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


  • Comment - This is a really hard name to Google search. It looks like a cool place, but as a single, smallish bar, there isn't likely to be much outside of the brief restaurant and bar guide entries that I'm seeing. There is a chance that there's some authentic media coverage relating to the bar's establishment, assuming it was imported piece-by-piece from Ireland... Carrite (talk) 04:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

::I just scanned through the most recent 50 items in the San Diego Union Trib archives (I have access). Pretty much just routine mentions, the "where to celebrate St. Patrick's Day" kind of stuff. I couldn't find a single mention of the bar being imported piece-by-piece from Ireland. The only thing at all non-routine was that a waitress from the pub was on American Idol.[http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid=1215EBBA5DD97EA8&p_docnum=11&s_dlid=DL0112082704292309372&s_ecproduct=SUB-FREE&s_ecprodtype=INSTANT&s_trackval=&s_siteloc=&s_referrer=&s_subterm=Subscription%20until%3A%2012%2F14%2F2025&s_docsbal=%20&s_subexpires=12%2F14%2F2025&s_docstart=&s_docsleft=&s_docsread=&s_username=sdubsub&s_accountid=AC0110122214325408110&s_upgradeable=no] --MelanieN (talk) 04:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)


  • Delete - I took another fresh go at this with different Google parameters. Many hits, but as nearly as I can tell they are from (a) their own site; (b) social media generated by the establishment; (c) common business and guide listings typical of all established businesses; (d) YouTube videos of music at the club. Nothing I could see in the way of the type of sourcing which we seek here — and I looked with a sympathetic eye. Carrite (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.