Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Forex Heatmap

:{{la|The Forex Heatmap}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Forex_Heatmap Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The Forex Heatmap}})

Non-notable company, per WP:ORG - the WSJ article is the only reliable source I can find and (ignoring that it's improperly used in the article) it's a passing mention in a list of other similar companies (so failing WP:CORPDEPTH). Nikthestunned 15:49, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:10, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

• Keep for now or userfy. I have not reviewed the subject of this article at all, however I want to point out that the primary author is a new editor who only joined on September 2014 and he already has a bunch of deletion nominations on unrelated article. Based on the wide varied subjects he edits per [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/ec/?user=Karlhard&project=en.wikipedia.org Xtools], he's clearly independent of those companies he's written about. I mean, wow! He's hardly two months old and has already contributed to over 300 unique pages. In order to avoid discouraging him as per WP:Bite, we should not delete his contributions lightly and instead kindly point out that he should be reviewing the notability guidelines. He may even voluntarily userfy those pages outside of AfD. I'd be open to revisiting this article in AfD in a few months. (Note: may include this argument in multiple AfDs) —CodeHydro 18:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

• Boldly redirected to Heat map, an already existent article whose "history" notes term devised to describe financial markets. Раціональне анархіст (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
• I've reverted; that doesn't seem like a useful redirect. ansh666 20:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Could not establish notability of this product or the company that offers it. ~KvnG 02:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.