Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Funco File

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singu larity 07:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[The Funco File]]=

:{{la|The Funco File}} ([{{fullurl:The Funco File|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Funco File}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable book by non-notable author, and mostly WP:COPYVIO to boot. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete - Not copyvio by the look of it, but [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&hs=uWL&q=%22The+Funco+File%22&btnG=Search&meta= Google] only gives me 750 or so results. Non-notable, delete.
Delete. Not Encyclopedic enough, and not reliable sources. Dwilso 15:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete It could be kept if there were some reliable sources about it, but in its current state it is not sourced and its notability is thus totally undemonstrative. DJLayton4 (talk) 03:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete It isn't even a proper article: it just copies the blurb on the back cover of the book. That is probably a copyright violation, but even if it isn't, it's just totally pointless and uninformative; it isn't even a stub. Certainly not something you expect to find in an enclycopedia. Richard75 (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.