Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hans India

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Though there was a general opinion the article in its current state was unsuitable, there was no obvious agreement as to what to do with it. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:The Hans India]]=

:{{la|The Hans India}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Hans_India Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The Hans India}})

I see no indication of notability. It exists, but the only references are itself, the content is promotional. Huon (talk) 18:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 18:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 18:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Userify. It doesn't quite meet G11 for advertising IMO. Another thing to consider is that articles about predominantly non-english speaking countries have a lot of sources that don't show up when you search in english. As is it doesn't meet GNG though. If I saw this in the new pages feed I would draftify it. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 09:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete - sources are self-published, I failed to locate any independent and reliable sources that are significant. - TheMagnificentist 12:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Keep - Though the article about the newspaper article has selfpublished sources but it should be kept the reason is the newspaper is regional (state level based) not national level so it won't have coverage from the reliable sources like Times of India, The Hindu, Indian Express etc other reason may be due to competition fear the reliable sources eg Times of India may not provide it coverage as they too have newspaper business. This subject is notable but not famous.

Anoptimistix (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.