Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hub Weekly

=[[The Hub Weekly]]=

:{{la|The Hub Weekly}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Hub_Weekly Stats])

:({{Find sources|The Hub Weekly}})

This publication only existed for about 2 years, no apparent coverage in any other source and was apparently just a free weekly paper with unclear circulation. There is no apparent notability. Even the webpage that once housed the paper is gone. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jamminjimmy&oldid=560989400].  Unscintillating (talk) 03:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)]

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete short-lived, non-notable local community alternative paper. Somehow I'm reminded of [http://www.theonion.com/articles/what-this-town-needs-is-a-really-shitty-community,10672/ this]. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 05:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge most important information about the competition of non-University affiliated weeklies in general into Illini Media.Crtew (talk) 07:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge, to retain relevant historical information. — Cirt (talk) 16:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge - Best option at this time, unless someone can make it meet GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.