Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Island, Croydon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

=[[:The Island, Croydon]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|The Island, Croydon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Island,_Croydon Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The Island, Croydon}})

Non-notable building. Fails WP:NBUILD. That a real estate agent is quoted on a local news website as saying the asking price of one of the flats is the most expensive in the town is not sufficient to make this building notable. The other coverage is not in-depth, but is merely routine, for example the pausing of construction. Pontificalibus 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable building. As someone who is familiar with Croydon, this building is only of local interest (there are many more buildings of greater interest in Croydon), due largely to its location in an odd position in a traffic island. It is otherwise a routine residential building. Only trivial mentions outside of local press of Croydon, and those in the local press amount to no more than routine announcements, fails WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.