Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Land of two Fields
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There appears to be a plausible argument for SALT as well. j⚛e deckertalk 02:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
=[[The Land of two Fields]]=
:{{la|The Land of two Fields}} – (
:({{Find sources|The Land of two Fields}})
Non-notable film with no coverage, does not meet WP:NF -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, no secondary coverage found. BOVINEBOY2008 15:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as one of several articles that looks to have been built to create a WP:WALLEDGARDEN around Zachary Laoutides, whose article is also up for deletion. On a side note, the account that created the article seems to be a sock so it could possibly be speedied that way if it was confirmed. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:35, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NFF and is TOO SOON. Allow undeletion or recreation only if or when the film is released and gets independent coverage. Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin: Multiple sockpuppets have appeared on the articles and AfDs related to Zachary Laoutides, of whose movie this article is about. The latest sockpuppet recreated recently deleted articles Zachary Laoutides, Midnight Charlie, and Adios Vaya Con Dios. I have salted the recreated articles for two years and I recommend that this article be salted for two years once the AfD is closed as the recreation of the aforementioned articles shows a pattern of promotion and not abiding to consensus. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:55, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.