Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mummy: Rise of the Aztecs

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Mummy (franchise)#Future. MBisanz ^talk 23:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[The Mummy: Rise of the Aztecs]]=

:{{la|The Mummy: Rise of the Aztecs}} ([{{fullurl:The Mummy: Rise of the Aztecs|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mummy: Rise of the Aztecs}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Rumour, fails WP:NFF. Jenuk1985 | Talk 23:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Redirect to The Mummy (1999 film); a web search shows that this movie may indeed be under consideration by this name [http://thecelebritycafe.com/movies/full_review/12808.html], but fails WP:NFF for the nonce. JJL (talk) 23:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect - There is some discussion at The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor about it, so it should be redirred there. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 00:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Rumor, fails :WP:CRYSTAL; if it ever gets made we can have an article, but this ain't Daily Variety. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Talk · ^Review 00:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete Agree with Orange Mike: fails WP:CRYSTAL. I don't see any reason to Redirect for an as-yet unshot film. Pigman☿/talk 01:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to The Mummy (franchise)#Future. Clearly fails WP:NFF at this time, so there shouldn't be a separate article. However, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/The_Mummy_(franchise)&hidelinks=1 several variations] of this title already redirect to the franchise article, and this one seems like a reasonable enough variation to redirect as well. Admittedly I'd feel better about it with a better source, but redirects are cheap and this does seem to be the name that's being used elsewhere on the Internet. BryanG (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete - WP:CRYSTAL. A-Kartoffel (talk) 07:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to The Mummy (franchise)#Future. The WP:NF and WP:CRYSTAL guidelines support the idea not to have a separate article, but they don't preclude notable speculation from multiple reliable sources to be mentioned briefly in a larger article. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

*Delete, non notable, crystal ball. Short notice in The Mummy (franchise)#Future should be enough. Deletion Mutation 17:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Blocked sockpuppet. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 20:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete: rumours, no evidence this is notable. JamesBurns (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.