Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oracle of Hi-Fi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:The Oracle of Hi-Fi]]=

:{{la|The Oracle of Hi-Fi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Oracle_of_Hi-Fi Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The Oracle of Hi-Fi}})

Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

:Comment I've found some reviews/sources and adding them. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

::An interview can be helpful but is a primary source. It needs reliable secondary coverage to be considered notable.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

:::Would [http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/entertainment/music/headstones-hope-to-repay-fans-faith-with-great-album-208618921.html this] or [http://www.vueweekly.com/breaking_up_isnrsquot_always_a_bad_thing_when_it_comes_to_music/ this] work? One of the [http://www.groundcontrolmag.com/headstones-discography-review/ references] I already included references the interview as well. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

::::I still am not seeing sources that talk about the album specifically (not just a few passing mentions). I'm all for keeping articles but if your scraping at the bottom of the barrel just to find small mentions of the album, it is probably a good indication it isn't notable enough for a standalone page.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

:::::I already have included reviews on the album in the reception section. I've also found a 2003 article in [https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-506693321.html Canadian Musician] detailing the recording process of the album. This article is also available in [http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/8994257/headstones EBSCO] as well, and I will be adding to the article since I have access to it. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.