Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Paper Tree

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[The Paper Tree]]=

:{{la|The Paper Tree}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Paper Tree}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|The Paper Tree}})

Reads like an advertisement. Makes numerous claims which are not backed up with references. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. No indication that it's anything other than just another office supply store. Contested prod. RadioFan (talk) 20:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Comment Not a lot to indicate notability, in my opinion. The only reference is a very close to the company line article. If this is to survive, it will need more, and more independent sounding. Peridon (talk) 21:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete as no changes made to establish notability (see Comment above). Peridon (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Weak Delete though it may be improved with additional references, the company itself doesn't seem to be notable. If it is kept, it should be written from a neutral point of view. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.