Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Push from the Bush

=[[:The Push from the Bush]]=

:{{la|1=The Push from the Bush}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=The Push from the Bush}})

Interesting topic but doesn’t appear to satisfy WP:GN or WP:NBOOK. ~ BlueTurtles | talk 11:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals and Australia. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment. I found [https://www.trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/110924075 this] mention in a 1978 edition of The Canberra Times, but it's not quite SIGCOV in my view. I also found [https://www.proquest.com/docview/1310519617 this] mention in The Australian Library Journal and a few sentences about the journal in [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Labour_History/E1ZaAAAAYAAJ this] issue of Labour History, but again neither are quite SIGCOV. I thought the discussion in [https://www.proquest.com/docview/2131975426 this book] looked promising, but like most of what I found, the relevant chapter turned out to be written by one of the journal's editors. It looks like The Push from the Bush was part of a larger project encompassing several journals and volumes called Australians: A Historical Library that was launched to mark the bicentennial, and that wider project is definitely notable, but we don't have an article about it that we could merge/redirect this to. I'll keep looking for additional sources, but at this point my !vote would be delete. MCE89 (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Social science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)