Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Salvador Darlings

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not my field, but consensus seems clear enough DGG ( talk ) 08:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

=[[The Salvador Darlings]]=

:{{la|The Salvador Darlings}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Salvador_Darlings Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The Salvador Darlings}})

Contested PROD. Fails WP:BAND PGWG (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Delete. No notability, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON but they certainly have no need for an article at this early stage. KaisaL (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Delete. Relatively new band lacking reliable sources to support they meet any of the criteria for musicians and ensembles. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete as still nothing substantial to suggest its own notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.