Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shake

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn It would've been nice if someone had PUT THE CHART POSITION in the damn article first. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[The Shake]]=

:{{la|The Shake}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shake}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|The Shake}})

Non-notable song, absolutely no sources. Suggest deletion over redirect, to make way for a notable Neal McCoy song with the same title. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Looked at the actual article's Discussion page when I happened to see the AfD notice, and saw the Australian portal infobox/badge & references to WikiProject Australia & Australian music article project(s). Could TPH's "non-notable song" remark be viewed in the light of a non-Aussie's viewpoint? Perhaps some Aussie editors can weigh-in with a better perspective on this, since ArticleAlertbot failed to flag it on the WP:AUSMUSIC Article Alerts page. DennisDallas (talk) 08:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

:Comment: [http://www.australian-charts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Kisschasy&titel=The+Shake&cat=s it charted in Australia]. Is that an argument for notability?--Shirt58 (talk) 10:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.