Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Switching Show 2009: With Greg James

:{{la|The Switching Show 2009: With Greg James}} ([{{fullurl:The Switching Show 2009: With Greg James|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Switching Show 2009: With Greg James}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable show. Endorsed prod was disputed.--Jmundo (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. A Google search doesn't even turn up any evidence that this is a real radio show. Even if it is, the article would require a complete rewrite. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete The article should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The article is clearly not notable upon verification.--Ped Admi (talk) 00:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. A crystal ball of unsourced unnotability and speculation.

1. A person might be popping around?
2. Sometimes he might go to a Football,Rugby or a Tennis match and do half an hour reports?
3. And my favourite: He Might do 4 hours and half hour sometimes if no people are doing it? --➨♀♂Candlewicke _S^T _{{{#if:||# :)}}} 21:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence of notability. Current article is pretty much just nonsense.--Rtphokie (talk) 01:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as zero evidence of notability, lots of evidence of improbability (one of the fill-in hosts is the current Doctor Who, guests may include "the two people from The Beatles"). - Dravecky (talk) 04:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.