Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Syllabus

:{{la|The Syllabus}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Syllabus Stats])

:({{Find sources|The Syllabus}})

Lacks notability per WP:NALBUMS. The title is more commonly used in an educational context and so should not redirect to the artist as this would confuse per WP:R#DELETE. Andrew (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

• Delete, (striking "Keep" original vote). I am guessing this comes up only because of attention brought from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syllabus (disambiguation). However this is one of 4 articles on albums by the same artist, and only this is nominated, and there is no evidence of searching to improve references. I am not familiar with albums notability standards, but comparability matters; "other stuff exists" guideline/essay notes that comparisons can be valid. Also, if sentiment goes against keeping a full article, a redirect to the artist would be better than outright deletion. No one searching for article on academic Syllabus would search for "The Syllabus"; there would be no confusion. --doncram 15:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

:* I searched for sources and didn't find any. As the album is not notable, there's no evidence that anyone will want to use this name to find the artist. We shouldn't let our namespace get cluttered up by such album and track titles if they have no notability. Andrew (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

::*Okay, convincing enough with Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars' comment below, too, so I have revised from Keep to Delete !vote. --doncram 01:48, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

• Delete Zero notability and would be an illogical redirect to the artist. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

---

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.