Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Thundersnow Corporation

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 08:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

=[[The Thundersnow Corporation]]=

:{{la|The Thundersnow Corporation}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Thundersnow_Corporation Stats])

:({{Find sources|The Thundersnow Corporation}})

Non-notable corporation that gets almost no Google hits at all. Note that I have also nominated Isaiah M. Williams, the founder, and The Williams Tie Company, his other company, in separate nominations. It shouldn't be difficult to find them, as it's a three-for-one combo deal today on non-notable articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete This is a promotional article full of unverifiable claims about a company without a website headed by a 17 year old. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:20, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Probably Delete - appears to not meet WP:CORP per source searches. The book sources in the article for The Keys to Youth Entrepreneurship are not accessible, hence the "probably" within my !vote. Who knows, perhaps there's significant coverage in the book, or only passing mentions?NorthAmerica1000 05:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  • {{reply to|Northamerica1000}} Well, they were written by the founder, and, as far as I can tell, they are self-published. At that point, I don't think it really matters how significant the coverage is. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for pointing that out. As the book source is a primary one that doesn't serve to establish notability, I have modified my !vote (below). NorthAmerica1000 05:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete - Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORP for an article on Wikipedia. Per the above, the book source in the article does not qualify to establish topic notability. NorthAmerica1000 05:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.