Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Undisputed Era

:{{la|The Undisputed Era}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Undisputed_Era Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The Undisputed Era}})

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Individuals are notable, but the group is not. No significant coverage of the group in reliable independent sources. Only WP:ROUTINE match results. Also, WP:TOOSOON as, according to the article, they've only had one official match. Nikki♥311 02:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 02:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete for the reasons given. Isn't much else to say.★Trekker (talk) 09:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete they may be notable in the future but not yet. Realistically it would likely be a minimum of sveral months before theee is enough coverage of the group as a whole for an article to be warranted.--67.68.21.146 (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• Keep Individuals are notable, so the group must be notable as well. Hansen Sebastian 10:22, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

::False. Notability is not inherited (WP:INHERIT). Nikki♥311 20:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

:::I agree, by that logic we would neeed to crate articles for every group in an 8 man tagteam match.--67.68.21.146 (talk) 23:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete WP:TOOSOON.LM2000 (talk) 05:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.