Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Way of Seeming

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:28, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

=[[The Way of Seeming]]=

:{{la|The Way of Seeming}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Way_of_Seeming Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The Way of Seeming}})

Non-notable independent film that hasn't even begun principal production. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NF utterly. Unable to find any non-trivial sources. --Non-Dropframe _talk 18:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Fails to meet WP:NOTFILM or WP:GNG. reddogsix (talk) 18:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

:Filmmaker:({{Find sources AFD| Joshua D. Maley, The Way of Seeming}})

:Producer:({{Find sources AFD|B.D. Allen, The Way of Seeming}})

:Production:({{Find sources AFD|Grimm Sleeper Productions, The Way of Seeming}})

Delete per failing WP:NFF. After this begins filming and if it gets the requisite coverage an undeletion or recreation can be considered. But for now it is simply TOO SOON. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete for now as IMDb lists for a February 2016 release and News and Books searches found nothing, even browser only found a few links and they're mostly HorrorSociety and other links listed in the article. SwisterTwister talk 20:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete - Google brings up stuff like Kickstarter & Horrorsociety but unfortunately nothing source-wise, Agree with the above looks TOOSOON atm. –Davey2010^Talk 15:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.