Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wild guys

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 17:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[The Wild guys]]=

:{{la|The Wild guys}} ([{{fullurl:The Wild guys|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wild guys}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article about an "up and coming" book "under construction" by several authors who all appear in it. The originator {{user1|Ckky}}, who I suspect is "Corbin Kinney", put in two-line articles, all speedied, about the characters/authors, and tried to insert the name "Corbin Kinney" into the articles Lost: Via Domus and Monkey-man of New Delhi. Probable self-promotion, and anyway fails WP:BK and WP:CRYSTAL. JohnCD (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy delete under WP:CSD#A7. I've added a {{tl|db-a7}} tag to the article. --Pixelface (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
regular delete I have removed the speedy as books are not generally speedyable. but I agree with the nominator that "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball" and Wikipedia:Notability (books) apply. Jon513 (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Strong Delete, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:N, WP:MADEUP and probably written in crayon on green paper judging by the quality of English in the article. Pete Fenelon (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy Delete Is there any evidence that this page is relevant? Icewolf34 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.