Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Winning Way

:{{la|The Winning Way}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Winning_Way Stats])

:({{Find sources|The Winning Way}})

This article is about the book, which is not notable under WP:BKCRIT. Even though it's author has a article on Wikipedia, The book itself fails to meet the notability criteria on Wikipedia. Max Viwe | Your Turn 11:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. A bit iffy (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. A bit iffy (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

• Comment I don't want to !vote now because I agree that the article didn't establish notability but I believe it may be notable. I just wanted to remark so anyone else looking for sources knows to look for sources for the book's full title as well "The winning way: Learning from Sport managers". Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

::({{Find sources|The winning way: Learning from Sport managers}})

• Keep The book is getting more and more popular these days. As of notability; try a [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+winning+way:+Learnings+from+Sport+managers%22&hl=en&source=lnms&ei=Ujy3T5PtM4KzrAfa9vjdBw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=1&ved=0CBMQ_AUoAA#hl=en&gs_nf=1&tok=Dppf2xC4n08rQwUpVUSG4Q&pq=%22the%20winning%20way%3A%20learnings%20from%20sport%20managers%22&cp=24&gs_id=z&xhr=t&q=the+winning+way+by+harsha+bhogle&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=%22The+winning+way+by+Hars%22&aq=0l&aqi=g-l3g-lK1&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1a85e6b793117752&biw=1024&bih=677&bs=1 Google Search] and you get plenty of notability. Also, the author, Harsha Bhogle is a famous sports manager and perhaps every Indian knows him (Well I got Off-topic to Harsha Bhogle). Research and you'll get it. Dipankan ^{(Have a chat?)} 06:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
• Keep. Notability guidelines are not cleanups. Clearly, it has published reviews, which substantiates an independent notability. The matter that this topic fails a guideline is irrelevant to the matter of this topic's notability itself. It can meet other guidelines if it would fail GNG, such as "not temporary" and "verifiable" sections in WP:notability. --George Ho (talk) 20:39, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
• Delete - it does pass WP:GNG and as far as WP:BKCRIT is concerned, it is not notable. According to WP:BKCRIT, this article fails point number: 2, 3 and 4 also little 1. It only passes point 5, but its author is notable and thus this doesn't make the book notable. →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 01:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
• WP:BRCRIT may not apply to this topic, but the topic is still notable. In fact, it may have a plot that inspires reviews, and the notability guideline about books are not totally absolute. Also, the article is encyclopedic and well-written. --George Ho (talk) 03:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.