Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The sacred way

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

Delete, then redirect to Sacred Way. --MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[The sacred way]]=

:{{la|The sacred way}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_sacred_way Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|The sacred way}})

Unsourced essay, flagged as nn and unsourced for five years. No one has rehabbed/rescued it yet. If anyone wants to step up now to fix it, that's fine, but otherwise I think we should ditch this as nn promotion. - CorbieV 23:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete, then create a redirect to the unrelated article Sacred Way as a plausible search string. My good faith search for sources about the subject described in the article came up empty. VQuakr (talk) 00:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - This is an open-and-shut case of something that really should be removed. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete as I'm simply seeing no better improvement and the current state is unacceptable and would likely need WP:TNT to become better. SwisterTwister talk 04:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete does not appear to be a term of art as described in the article. Otherwise, it is just an idiosyncratic expression of standard pantheism. --Bejnar (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.