Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The world is bigger than five

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Foreign policy of the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan government. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

=[[:The world is bigger than five]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|The world is bigger than five}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=The world is bigger than five}})

There does not seem to be any such political doctrine as "The world is bigger than five", the citations also do not mention any such term, also unable to find anything else-where. Fails WP:NOR, WP:NOTE & WP:NOT. The Turkish leaders website states it as a "motto" [https://www.tccb.gov.tr/en/news/542/89052/our-motto-the-world-is-bigger-than-five-is-the-biggest-ever-rise-against-global-injustice]. Correcting this on the article would not fit in my view as every political quote or slogan coined does not warrant a page. TataofTata (talk) 14:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

:As the creator of the page, I think that the sources that is already existed on the page mention and detail it as opposite of the claims, where the term can be found with a quick search on the existing sources. About original research and lack of notability claims, I think that the doctrine got enough amount of detailed coverage on a long period, as [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22the+world+is+bigger+than+five%22 a quick Scholar search] shows it even got coverage from Al Jazeera.{{efn|I don't exactly and specifically know the reliability of its "studies", but WP:RSP states:

{{quote|Al Jazeera is considered a generally reliable news organization. Editors perceive Al Jazeera English (and Aljazeera.com) to be more reliable than Al Jazeera's Arabic-language news reporting. Some editors say that Al Jazeera, particularly its Arabic-language media, is a partisan source with respect to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Al Jazeera's news blogs should be handled with the corresponding policy. }}}}
About claim of WP:NOT, I am unable to understand how is it not complying with Wikipedia's existing guidelines and policies, other than claims of original research and lack of notability. {{pb}}The only thing I really agree is that not every political quote or slogan automatically requires a page, but I think this article is not one of them.{{pb}}{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} Ahmetlii (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.