Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Then I Corrupt Youth

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Anberlin. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Then I Corrupt Youth]]=

:{{la|Then I Corrupt Youth}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Then_I_Corrupt_Youth Stats])

:({{Find sources|Then I Corrupt Youth}})

Non-notable album from a non-notable band Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete The album's not notable it doesn't even really link to any pages Koala15 (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Selling only 1,300 copies_{(referenced at Anberlin)} is not a good indicator of notability. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:10, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Redirect to Anberlin (SaGoh 24/7 turned into Anberlin, and the article on Anberlin discusses both bands). Not notable album: no reviews, awards, etc. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
I'll support the redirect Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:50, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.