Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theology of relational care

:{{la|Theology of Relational Care}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Theology_of_relational_care Stats])

:({{Find sources|Theology of Relational Care}})

Doesn’t meet wiki’s notoriety requirements/not asserting importance. Secondary sources using term don’t exist. Theologianguy (talk) 08:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

::Did you intend to say "notability" rather than "notoriety"? Cindy(talk) 07:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:20, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

• Keep. Article is supported by at least one source that uses the term "theology of relational care" in the title, so I'm puzzled when TG says that the sources do not use the term. A [https://www.google.com/search?num=20&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22relational+care%22+theology+-wikipedia&oq=%22relational+care%22+theology+-wikipedia&gs_l=serp.3...36574.39191.0.39938.11.11.0.0.0.0.101.802.10j1.11.0.ernk_timediscountc..0.0...1.1.17.serp.O2bOBNjPov8 search for additional sources] returns numerous possibilities with which to support notability, while expanding the article. With all sincere respect, it appears as though the article was not afforded a thorough review prior to nomination. Cindy(talk) 07:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 19:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete The only source is that it was used as a title for a master's thesis at Harvard. Essentially all the links on the search cited are false hits--either just a search of a newspaper using the term, which yields nothing, or articles where the words are used in the same article but not as a phrase . It does look like Relational care might be a viable topic, but I think it would probably include material other than what is in the present article. DGG ( talk ) 01:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep. There are many sources Jewish and Christian sources discussing "relational care" in the context of theology (e.g. [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13674676.2010.488416 here]), even if the exact phrase "theology of relational care" is not used. -- 202.124.72.14 (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 10:11, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.