Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of the sun and the moon

:{{la|Theory of the sun and the moon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Theory_of_the_sun_and_the_moon Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Theory of the sun and the moon}})

This is not a theory, it is an analogy. As such I do not think it merits an article. TheLongTone (talk) 16:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

::Sources do no support your personal interpretation. --Nemo 17:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

• Keep, but rename. To my personal surprise, this is fairly widely discussed, with absolutely no shortage of high-quality sources available. That said, I'll agree that the titling is problematic and would propose Sun and moon allegory as the proper alternative. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
• Keep. There are many sources, see [https://www.google.com/search?q=innocent+iii++sun+and+the+moon&num=100&newwindow=1&biw=1680&bih=916&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAWoVChMIkZ--rtm4xwIVSTsaCh1iKAD9 GBooks].--Yopie (talk) 22:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
• Keep, and as for the 'theory' part, yes, it is a theory of political science. Snowsuit Wearer (talk|contribs) 20:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

:*However, especially in scholarly sources, "sun and moon allegory" is pretty common, and "theory of the sun and the moon" (or even "theory of sun and moon") if not completely unknown, is very rare, suggesting the rename is proper per WP:COMMONNAME. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

::*OK, I wouln't mind a renaming of the article, as long as it is not deleted. Snowsuit Wearer (talk|contribs) 22:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

It would be suicide this kind of "knowledge theory" (I mean new) was entirely new to me it has to be kept for the sake of good practice I never heard of the idea until I came across article on Dante "On Monarchy".I would settle for a rename but keep the page.The page has to be saved Richardlord50 (talk) 13:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Suggest the article be renamed or incorporated with Unam sanctam.Richardlord50 (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

• Keep - But I agree that it should be renamed as the 'Sun and moon allegory' CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 11:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.