Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There Is Some Fun Going Forward

=[[There Is Some Fun Going Forward]]=

:{{la|There Is Some Fun Going Forward}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|There Is Some Fun Going Forward}})

Non-notable compilation. [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22there+is+some+fun+going+forward%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a 10 pages of Google results] shows only [http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/oct/07/label-love-dandelion this] third-party source, which is trivial coverage. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=There_Is_Some_Fun_Going_Forward&action=historysubmit&diff=443071069&oldid=442966808 PROD was denied] because apparently someone has paid a lot of money for this and the owner of the record label is himself notable. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 06:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

:*Keep - notable record release (the label's only sampler) on a notable (and incidentally very collectable) record label, established by an extremely notable and influential person. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:15, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

::*Response Notability isn't inherited. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 11:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep I agree with Ghmyrtle. As the only sampler on this label it's worth noting. Dandelion was one of the most esoteric UK labels of the period, and anyone reading up on it would have an interest in knowing what tracks were selected for the comp. As evidenced by Gary Lucas's [http://garylucas.blogspot.com/2005/10/peel-before-using.html comments] the sampler had much wider distribution than most Dandelion releases, reaching the USA. Wwwhatsup (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.