Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thereby

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Thereby]]=

:{{la|Thereby}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thereby Stats])

:({{Find sources|Thereby}})

Dictionary definition, no encyclopedic content Mean as custard (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

  • DELETE - Actually, Mean as custard is as fast as Superman as I was just about to AfD this myself. Without stating the obvious about no references or notability, this is something for Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. --UsedEdgesII (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete, as I had already suggest in the PROD. Nothing encyclopedic to be said about a basic word of the English vocabulary. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Not surprisingly, Wiktionary has had its own definition page for this word for almost eight years. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.