Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third battle of Anandpur (1704)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Third battle of Anandpur (1704)]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Third battle of Anandpur (1704)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Third battle of Anandpur (1704)}})

No reliable sources were used. User has a history of making poorly sourced articles, sometimes with copyright violations, that aggrandize the Sikh side in armed conflicts. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete: Analysing references from a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Third_battle_of_Anandpur_(1704)&oldid=1195652520 version] before cleanup, the [https://www.sikhmissionarysociety.org/sms/smspublications/The%20Great%20Sikh%20Women.pdf first source] is a no-byline compilation from the religious portal [https://www.allaboutsikhs.com/ allaboutsikhs.com], the [https://books.google.com/books?id=bDccEAAAQBAJ&dq=bibi+dalair+kaur&pg=PA174 second source] is self-published and the [https://books.google.de/books?vid=ISBN9798885750233&redir_esc=y third source] from a self-published novel-author is [https://www.hindueshop.com/product/saffron-swords-book-2/ "historical fiction"]. Unless WP:HISTRS sources are provided to determine notability WP:NEVENT, fiction has no place here. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sources before cleanup were all unreliable. This is one of those many articles where the editor has no WP:COMPETENCE that could result in any benefaction. This article has no significant notability with no coverage from scholarly sources. RangersRus (talk) 13:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.