Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Conroy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nom. DGG (talk) 01:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Thomas Conroy]]=

:{{la|Thomas Conroy}} ([{{fullurl:Thomas Conroy|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Conroy}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod (tag removed from article creator without reason) about an individual that does not seem to satisfy WP:POLITICIAN. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 19:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Strong keep Individual very much does seem to meet WP:POLITICIAN, to be specific the part that says: "People who have held ... first-level sub-national political office, including members of a legislature." The Massachusetts House of Representatives is precisely that. Valenciano (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Member of a state legislature? Keep. He wins WP:POLITICIAN. Crafty (talk) 23:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Sadly, that passes as notable. I believe that standard is much too low. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
In that case, I withdraw the nomination. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 06:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.