Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Metcalfe (Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Indeed, AfD is not for cleanup, notability was never in question, and the article is sourced now anyway due to the efforts of Bejnar.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Thomas Metcalfe (Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster)]]=

:{{la|Thomas Metcalfe (Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Metcalfe_(Chancellor_of_the_Duchy_of_Lancaster) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Thomas Metcalfe (Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster)}})

Article is an unsourced microstub left unchanged for over 4 years. No citations and no evidence of notability. Delete UnrepentantTaco (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jamminjimmy&oldid=560989400].  Unscintillating (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)]

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep Sir Thomas Metcalfe was an eminent man of his time, a close councilor of King Richard III. See the sources now cited in the article. The article is still a stub, but his notability should be established. --Bejnar (talk) 01:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - Under criterion 2e of WP:SK. Also, can someone point out where we delete articles for being "microstubs?" --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep Probably doesn't meet Speedy Keep criteria, but clearly makes claim of notability as member of the Council and Duchy of Lancaster court. Needs expanding, and will probably be interesting when it is, but that is no reason to delete. Cheers, LindsayHello 06:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.