Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Rau

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

=[[Thomas Rau]]=

:{{la|Thomas Rau}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Thomas Rau}})

Subject does not appear to qualify as notable under WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. Nothing of significance found at Google News or Google Scholar. The article has no references except external links to Rau's own webpages. MelanieN (talk) 19:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. —MelanieN (talk) 19:42, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 19:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Delete I'm not seeing anything even approaching what's required for WP:ACADEMIC; a search didn't turn up anything meaningful. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:45, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete per TBOTNL. I can't find anything of the in-depth nature necessary to satisfy WP:GNG standards. --Jayron32 18:30, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

:TBOTNL? I thought I knew most of the Wikipedia jargon but that's a new one on me. --MelanieN (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

::Look up one post from mine. Look carefully. --Jayron32 19:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

:::LOL! As my Dad used to say, if it was a snake it would have bitten me. --MelanieN (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:34, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.