Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas and the Missing Christmas Tree

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Thomas & Friends (series 2). Will indefinitely semiprotect due to repeated recreation. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

=[[Thomas and the Missing Christmas Tree]]=

:{{la|Thomas and the Missing Christmas Tree}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_and_the_Missing_Christmas_Tree Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Thomas and the Missing Christmas Tree}})

Absolutely no indication of notability; essentially a plot summary and credits, taken from the episode itself and/or IMDb. Repeatedly created, redirected and recreated by an anonymous editor who ignores all talk requests. Needs salt. SummerPhD^v2.0 05:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Comment - Also applies to Thomas & Bertie, Thomas, Percy and the Coal, Thomas Comes to Breakfast, Percy Takes the Plunge, Thomas & Gordon and A Scarf for Percy, but I have no clue how to setup one AFD for multiple articles. - SummerPhD^v2.0 05:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Redirect or delete - I converted most of these to redirects, but the articles' creator was silently resistant and has now resorted to sockpuppetry via IP 2601:1C1:8203:A370:E5A4:2196:4749:782 to convert them back to articles. Redirecting and semiprotecting the pages would be fine, but I can also see an argument for deletion if the kid is gonna start being a pain about it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 10:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 10:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Redirect to Thomas & Friends (series 2). It is normal practice to have articles on seasons, but not on individual episodes. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Both Thomas, Percy and the Coal and Percy Takes the Plunge can also be redirected to Thomas & Friends (series 2). I have retargeted Cyphoidbomb's redirects to the relevant article on the series/season. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Redirect does seem absolutely the right thing here. If the user is being troublesome then it's an admin (or dispute resolution) matter; obviously the sockpuppetry can be reported. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete. This isn't a useful search term. Szzuk (talk) 20:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Redirect to Thomas & Friends (series 2) - Perfectly acceptable search term if one is looking for the individual episode, No evidence of notability for an article so makes sense to Merge than Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Redirect to Thomas & Friends (series 2). Not finding enough source coverage to qualify an article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Redirect the bunch of them for lack of reliable secondary coverage, and semi-protect. I was going to close this as "redirect," but I haven't the tools to perform the protection, so it would be neater if somebody that does closes this. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.