Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thre3

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G11 by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Thre3]]=

:{{la|Thre3}} ([{{fullurl:Thre3|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thre3}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable book. The author admits ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thre3&oldid=294202539]) to having written the book as part of a college project, and then written the article as part of another college project to "get noticed". Several speed delete tags (including a {{tl|db-userreq}} incorrectly placed instead of a {{tl|db-author}}) resulted in an admin declining speedy. So here we are at afd. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Snowball delete. Article states that this was done for a college project, and that it is only available through a self-"publishing" website. No assertion of notability. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Dawn Bard (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete because its WP:SNOWing outside. This book in no way meets the standards set out at WP:N. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete per all the above reasons. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 06:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.