Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrillscape 3D

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

=[[Thrillscape 3D]]=

:{{la|Thrillscape 3D}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thrillscape_3D Stats])

:({{Find sources|Thrillscape 3D}})

Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:TOOSOON. Google News search shows nothing. None of the sources are independent of the subject. Note that the "Business Week" (sic) source is not a magazine article but a self-authored listing on a social networking website. Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy delete No evidence of notability JoelWhy?(talk) 14:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The Businessweek reference is actualyl just a directory entry and not independent coverage. Article is promotional in nature although not to the point of a speedy deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 13:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Keep WP:TOOSOON. Doesn’t apply since 3D tech has been around since the 1950's, and has made a major comeback as of 2005 starting with Aliens of the Deep. Regarding WP:CORPDEPTH there are a couple of other reference here [http://www.ycrazymind.com/2012/06/thrillscape-3d-interview-with-shola.html][http://www.free-press-release.com/news-thrillscape-releases-newest-version-of-detachable-3d-glasses-for-branding-display-1335869656.html] and one that would have been used by (Press release)PR-USA.net, but had expired [http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGdVrcI_ZPsmkA4pNXNyoA?p=thrillscape&fr2=sb-top&fr=yfp-t-701] 2nd from the bottom. The only promotional thing I see is that the company allows their customers to print Logo and advertisements on the 3D glasses.--‎Jetijonez ^Fire! 00:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Comment - That's a blog and a press release; neither of which constitute a reliable source for establishing notability. -- Whpq (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.