Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Throatee

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 22:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Throatee]]=

:{{la|Throatee}} ([{{fullurl:Throatee|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Throatee}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Massive triple-N: Non-notable neologism. And honestly, this article's continued existence here is probably a WP:SNOW case. Vianello (talk) 02:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

:*MINOR beg to differ. Speedy delete as WP:SNOW, sure, but it's not nonsense, or made-up in the capacity that an existing criterion would make it a hoax/vandalism. But I'm just picking nits so hard I could do it professionally here. - Vianello (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

::* Question. Hunh? -- Mikeblas (talk) 02:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. -- Mikeblas (talk) 02:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as WP:SNOW. But (sigh) now I suppose I'll have to ditch my plans to write up "Nostrache." Jlg4104 (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete--and it's also the death of my far-fetched 'eard' (my wife says the hair on my ears is like a beard). Drmies (talk) 04:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • "eard" -- there's beauty in the simplicity of that one! Jlg4104 (talk) 19:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete junk. JuJube (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.