Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Throw In Records

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[Throw In Records]]=

:{{la|Throw In Records}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Throw_In_Records Stats])

:({{Find sources|Throw In Records}})

unconnected series of unsourced "facts". Anything that a source can be found for would fit in the existing Throw-in article. noq (talk) 17:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete If the content can be verified to a reliable source, it could be included in Throw-in. Sperril (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete Looks like a lot of unverified original research. Anything worth salvaging should be included in throw-in, provided that sources can be found. — sparklism ^hey! 06:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete - only one of these is a "record" per se, and that is unsourced, the others are just random trivia. Nothing really worth salvaging that I can see -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete - Unsourced original research, and pure cruft. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete – I struggled to understand what this article was about at first. Definitely original research and cruft. – Kosm1 fent 15:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Unsourced information, possible Original Research. Creator has had ample time to add sources, and has failed to do so. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete, unsourced and not useful. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete - serves no use whatsoever. Giant Snowman 21:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete - unsourced and original research. There is no information in this article that cannot be placed in Throw-in if a source is added. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Unsourced trivia. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.