Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tianna

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Tianna}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tianna Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tianna}})

There is a book but the link goes to an empty page. Plus only a single fact is sourced to.suggesting it lacks depth. What is left is poor gruel for a BLP and utterly fails GNG. Porn awards no.longer offer any notability so a clear fail as a blp Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete does not fit the inclusion criteria for performers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
• Keep - John Stagliano cites her role in pioneering gonzo pornography which passes criteria 3 of WP:ENTERTAINER or criteria 1 of WP:CREATIVE.[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23268743.2016.1259580?journalCode=rprn20] "[Tianna] looked right at me, actually looking at the camera, it was the first time that something like this had really happened in porn. That to me was a vehicle for being creative and doing weird stuff. It quickly became tremendously popular". Her hall of fame status is an acknowledgment of this role. She is referenced on 10 pages in this book[https://books.google.com/books?id=w2bSt5JdQUYC&pg=PA86&dq=%22tianna%22+porn&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBy76bi-nmAhUSa80KHa33BMUQ6AEwAHoECAUQAg#v=snippet&q=%22tianna%22%20porn&f=false]. Other sources limited by the google preview include [https://books.google.com/books?newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&id=A_FEAQAAIAAJ&dq=%22tianna%22+porn&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=tianna][https://books.google.com/books?id=uQ97YT9nAjoC&pg=PA182&dq=%22tianna%22+porn&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBy76bi-nmAhUSa80KHa33BMUQ6AEwAnoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=%22tianna%22%20porn&f=false] Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
• Keep Passes WP:GNG.-Splinemath (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete a non-notable actress.--NL19931993 (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. In reference to the claim made above by Morbidthoughts about Stagliano, a porn producer praising a porn performer for her porn prowess does not confer notability in Wikipedia. The other sources cited are simple & routine name drops ([https://books.google.com/books?newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&id=A_FEAQAAIAAJ&dq=%22tianna%22+porn&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=tianna here] & [https://books.google.com/books?id=uQ97YT9nAjoC&pg=PA182&dq=%22tianna%22+porn&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBy76bi-nmAhUSa80KHa33BMUQ6AEwAnoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=%22tianna%22%20porn&f=false here]) in two books about pornography, which, no surprise, are bound to contain names of porn performers. Sources verifying her Wikinotability beyond porn are not there. Our subject blatantly fails WP:NACTOR. -The Gnome (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete, for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:BIO. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per the recently depreciated WP:PORNBIO Wm335td (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.