Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiddlyWiki

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[TiddlyWiki]]=

:{{la|TiddlyWiki}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|TiddlyWiki}})

Non notable management software. No reliable sources provided, none found besides download links and promo material. TN X Man 16:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

:Keep: Voted as one of the top 100 tools for 2007 and 2008 by the Centre for Learning & Performance Technologies ([http://www.c4lpt.co.uk/Top100Tools/tiddlywiki.html link]). Article needs to be improved, not deleted. Greenman (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

:*Comment: Without prejudice to the discussion, what about this vote confers notability on the subject, and what makes this center a reliable authority? Ravenswing 17:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

:*Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

:Keep: I agree the article should be improved, rather than deleted. Since this Delete notice has been posted in the Google Group where the TiddlyWiki community is relatively active, I expect various members of that community may contribute improvements to this wikipedia TiddlyWiki page. User:HansWobbe 02:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

:Keep: Maybe see german entry TiddlyWiki (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/TiddlyWiki) for an article more improved? Mgsimon (talk) 09:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

:Keep: I'm a contributor to the TiddlyWiki core, and have been involved with a number of projects using TiddlyWiki including [http://tiddlyspace TiddlySpace], working for [http://osmosoft.com Osmosoft], a small team of Open Source developers at BT. The TiddlyWiki code is being actively maintained, which can be seen from [http://trac.tiddlywiki.org trac.tiddlywiki.org] and is in the process of being moved to github.com. The [http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/about discussion list] still receives in the order of 300-900 messages each month, but quantifying actual use of TiddlyWiki is difficult due to its distributed nature and common use for personal notes and as a guerilla wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psd (talk • contribs) 11:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.