Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Clark (author)

:{{la|Tim Clark (author)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tim_Clark_(author) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tim Clark (author)}})

Article seems to be autobiographical; notability not established despite request dating to 2009; no answer to allegation of autobiography attached to page. JoshuSasori (talk) 04:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 20:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 20:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

• Delete. I'd done a pretty thorough search and other than a large amount of merchant sites, reviews by non-usable blogs, and listings of speaking appearances, there's really not anything out there to show that this author or any of his books have enough notability to merit an article at this time. I had hits come up for various other Tim Clarks, but none that showed notability enough for this Tim Clark.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

---

• Delete: per Tokyogirl79. HairyWombat 05:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree that notability is not established under either WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. Run of the mill academic, as one could say. Tijfo098 (talk) 19:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.