Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Goodrich

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Tim Goodrich]]=

:{{la|Tim Goodrich}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tim_Goodrich Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tim Goodrich}})

WP:BLP of a city councillor, in a city not large enough to confer automatic inclusion rights on its city councillors under WP:NPOL (only major metropolitan global cities on the order of Los Angeles, New York City, Toronto or London get that) — and the only two sources cited here are both primary ones (his own website and the city's) rather than reliable source coverage, which means he can't claim a WP:GNG pass either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 15:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 15:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete. Councillor in a medium-sized city. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:NPOL and GNG Kraxler (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.