Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Metcalf

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

=[[Tim Metcalf]]=

:{{la|Tim Metcalf}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Tim Metcalf}})

fails WP:AUTHOR (particularly criteria 1 and 4), found very limited coverage of this author such as [http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-96122904/tim-metcalf-corvus-book.html] and [http://www.abc.net.au/water/stories/s1923634.htm?backyard] but not much else. simply winning 1 not well known award (it's not a national award) doesn't grant automatic notability. LibStar (talk) 00:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Delete as I could not find significant coverage of this person to pass WP:AUTHOR. ArcAngel (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete - I'm pretty sure I've met this person, and with all due respect to him he's not (yet) notable. (Certainly not per WP:AUTHOR). And while we're at it, with regrets to the fine people at the ACT Writer's Centre, who I definitely HAVE met, the ACT Writing and Publishing Awards aren't notable either (they're a short step above vanity press), although at least one of the recipients is. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:18, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep Nice stub on a notable author and doctor. He's won some awards. Published several works. Seems fine to me. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep. it's a stub about an author who seems to meet the notability requirements. Article is adequately referenced. Gillyweed (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep He seems to be notable in a local sort of way. Won some notable awards, written up in the local news. Ray^Talk 13:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.