Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Peterson (Wisconsin)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Tim Peterson (Wisconsin)]]=

:{{la|Tim Peterson (Wisconsin)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tim_Peterson_(Wisconsin) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tim Peterson (Wisconsin)}})

Obscure losing politician; fails WP:POLITICIAN. Orange Mike | Talk 06:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete So obscure I barely remember seeing his name on the ballot when I voted in these elections. Generally a third-party candidate in Wisconsin gets no attention unless they're above 20% in an election, which this person never got in their votes. Nate • (chatter) 22:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - While I personally believe it is shortsighted to delete the biographies of unelected candidates for public office, consensus on this matter is well established. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 22:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. Google News turns up a lot of passing mentions and a few articles which look more in-depth, but all of those are from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel so only constitute one source for WP:GNG purposes. I can't find anything else close to significant coverage, and there's no obvious single target for this to redirect to. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete due to lack of significant coverage. Instaurare (talk) 19:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.