Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timecamp

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

=[[Timecamp]]=

:{{la|Timecamp}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Timecamp}})

Completely non-notable piece of software; made by a non-notable company and without any mention in reliable sources. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 13:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete Borderline A7 Speedy Delete, as it doesn't really make a claim of notability, nor is it. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete I would have speedy deleted it if software were speedy deletable, so I prodded instead. The reason why software isn't speediable is a good one--someone may actually know something about it and know of some sources). No harm in letting it run the 7 days. DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Comment Good point. I used to know that, thanks for the reminder. Dennis Brown (talk) 23:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete - does not appear to be notable. --George100 (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete - No indication of notability. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 17:26, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.