Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Command & Conquer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --MCB 03:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

=[[Timeline of Command & Conquer]]=

:{{la|Timeline of Command & Conquer}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Nominated for deletion per WP:NOT#CRYSTAL/WP:NOT#OR and WP:NOT#PLOT. MrStalker ^talk 07:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Redirect it's not crystal ballery so far as the content is concerned, but it does violate WP:NOT#PLOT. Since it provides a brief timeline, I suggest it gets redirected to Command & Conquer (series)#Story arc, since that particular section is more or less the same.--Alasdair 08:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

:It's crystal since it's not properly sourced. Besides, the subject in itself is controversial since there is a lot of devided opinion in the C&C-community about how the timeline of the Red Alert and Tiberian series hang together. --MrStalker ^talk 08:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

::I thought WP:CRYSTAL only applied to uncertain future events. Although I could just say it's unsourced. Having played the games, the content is correct, but the exact years aren't verified. So, it is a bit like original research.--Alasdair 08:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

:::Perhaps, I don't know exactly 100% what applies to what. But it is unsourced alright. --MrStalker ^talk 09:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

::::Yup, being OR already qualifies it for deletion, or redirect to the relevant article.--Alasdair 11:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete' This is really a plot summary, trying to document what happened over the course of C&C games Corpx 04:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. WP:NOT#PLOT indeed. I don't see a reason for a redirect either. --User:{{{User (User talk:{{{User) 19:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.