Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Stanley
=[[Timothy Stanley]]=
:{{la|Timothy Stanley}} ([{{fullurl:Timothy Stanley|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Stanley}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Removed recently-placed PROD template, since this article has actually been deleted twice through PROD. The nominator's reason was: "Not a notable person; notability was queried 7 months ago with no update". Jamie☆S93 19:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Look, I have my own Wikipedia article, I've arrived......but still not notable. A side not, the last deprod was by a user who is now indef blocked for his disruptive de-prodding. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Not WP notable yet but could be in the future. Sarcasm is not appropriate on these pages. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC).
- Delete. Neither the article nor the various Google searches that I tried provide any indication of the academic impact that would lead to a pass of WP:PROF #1, nor that his ideas have become sufficiently widespread in the popular press to pass WP:BIO more generally. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.