Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin-foil hats in popular culture

{{ns:0|S}}

:{{la|Tin-foil hats in popular culture}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested ProD, nominating for full AfD... another one of those "List of ___ in popular culture" articles.

:*Unencyclopedic content -- "Tin-foil hats in popular culture" (come on!)

:*Unreferenced / original research -- There are no acceptable/reliable sources because this isn't really a notable topic. Nor should wikipedia be an indiscriminant list of places you've seen someone wear a tinfoil hat. //Blaxthos 11:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. /Blaxthos 11:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

• The topic made me chuckle! Some, ah, thorough research has been conducted here, but as I can't imagine anyone ever looking this up and it seems to be OR, I must regretably vote delete (haha tin foil hats) Monkeymox 12:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete - Wikipedia is not a directory of loosely-associated topics. The items in the indiscriminate list have nothing in common beyond the presence of a foil hat and in a number of instances don't even share that. Ridiculously trivial article. Otto4711 14:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Otto4711. Pretty soon I'm expecting an article entitled Popular culture in popular culture. --Charlene 16:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• What's wrong with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Popular_culture&diff=124180600&oldid=123981709 Popular culture in popular culture]? Phony Saint 18:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Excuse me while I find a brick wall... --Charlene 00:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Perhaps you can find some Brick walls in popular culture (I pray that's a redlink). Otto4711 02:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Merge the better-known examples to Tin-foil hat on the basis that it can't make that article any less encyclopedic ... the photos and the external links are classic. EliminatorJR ^Talk 18:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Note: was originally forked from tin-foil hat. —dgies^t_c 18:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Merge. The tin-foil hat is essentially a popular culture meme from the get-go. Any data thought to be too disorganized to appear as is in the article in chief should be moved to a subpage of the talk page for the convenience of future editors rather than deleted. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.