Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin Can Pomade

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

=[[Tin Can Pomade]]=

:{{la|Tin Can Pomade}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tin_Can_Pomade Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tin Can Pomade}})

Article about a non-notable product. I am unable to find any reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 17:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete-the product is only a few months old also. Wgolf (talk) 18:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:FAILN, a notability search fails to turn up anything notable besides some WP:ROUTINE coverage on etsy. I recommend per WP:ALTERNATIVE to put information on subject on a blog but not in an encyclapedia, per WP:ONEDAY this isn't a good fit for the topic. Bryce Carmony (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete-Per nom. Cheap Promo. Educationtemple (talk) 19:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.