Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Bracher

:{{la|Todd Bracher}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Todd_Bracher Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Todd Bracher}})

• Delete Appears to fail WP:CREATIVE and GNG. Wikipedia is not a platform for hosting personal CV's. I'm not 100% sure that the awards meet the criteria. For example, the article doesn't clarify that the "2016 Designer of the Year" award is from "Interiors and Sources" magazine which does not appear notable, etc. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

• Delete "Bracher and his team employ a process of Strategic Design which drives business growth through aligning market opportunities with business optimization." is meaningless promotional language. Mduvekot (talk) 14:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as promotional and non-notable. I was transiently excited by the [http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/styled-to-a-t-todd-bracher/?_r=0 New York Times Magazine] reference, until I read it. It is clearly about the subject, but not at all the depth of coverage we require. None of the other references in the article approach what we're looking for. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.