Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Caliguire

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Todd Caliguire}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Todd_Caliguire Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Todd Caliguire}})

Fails WP:POLITICIAN, county freeholder and unsuccessful gubernatorial primary candidate Rusf10 (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. Neither serving on a county council nor being an unsuccessful candidate in a party primary passes WP:NPOL at all, but this is not referenced anywhere close to well enough to get him over the bar that he would actually have to clear. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
• Delete not enough sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
• Keep. There are quite a number of sources that are not in the article. Here's one from the New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/24/nyregion/in-person-in-the-shadows-a-dark-horse.html Here's some more: https://newjerseyglobe.com/governor/republican-still-holds-174k-murphy-administration-job/ https://patch.com/new-jersey/ridgewood/governor-christie-appoints-ridgewoods-todd-caliguire-dcb680f7ae. There are hundreds of sources found by google search, many more found at newspapers.com. They aren't in the article, but that's no reason to delete the article. Passes gng.Jacona (talk) 13:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

::All of those are still local sources. All politicians receive local press coverage, that does not make them notable.--Rusf10 (talk) 14:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

:::Agreed, that routine local coverage does not make a politician notable. Disagreed, that the only coverage of Aguirre is routine local coverage. There are hundreds of references, in addition to the New Jersey sources, there are some for which the moniker "local" is debatable such as the New York Times, New York Sun, New York Post Philadelphia Inquirer, the sierra club of NJ, and some that are unquestionably not local, such as the Buffalo newspaper. It's not just a few reference, there are a plethora. He is also the [https://www.questia.com/newspaper/1P2-36191940/caliguire-new-director-of-water-commission|executive director of the North Jersey District Water Supply Commission], which serves 2 million people, was part of Chris Crhistie's [https://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20100312_Christie_orders_panel_to_study_privatizing_to_cut_costs.html| privatization task force], served on the [https://www.state.nj.us/sci/pdf/annual43.pdf| State Commission of Investigation].Jacona (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

::::Bergen County (i.e. Newark, Hackensack, etc.) is part of the New York City metropolitan area, so New York City media coverage is local coverage for a figure from Bergen County. And "North Jersey District Water Supply Commission", "privatization task force" and "State Commission of Investigation" are not WP:NPOL-passing roles. Bearcat (talk) 20:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

• Delete an article seems promotional since the subject is not notable. Does not appear to pass WP:NPOL or WP:POLITICIAN Lubbad85 (☎) 23:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.